Guide
How to choose a 409A valuation provider
Updated
Almost every claim on a 409A provider's website is unfalsifiable. The regulation, by contrast, is specific, and it is where a shortlist should start.
What the regulation actually presumes
For stock that is not readily tradable on an established securities market, Treas. Reg. 1.409A-1(b)(5)(iv)(B)(2) sets out methods of valuation that are presumed to result in a reasonable valuation, and the presumption can be rebutted by the Commissioner only "upon a showing that either the valuation method or the application of such method was grossly unreasonable". The first of those methods is "a valuation of a class of stock determined by an independent appraisal that meets the requirements of section 401(a)(28)(C) and the regulations as of a date that is no more than 12 months before the relevant transaction to which the valuation is applied" (eCFR, 26 CFR 1.409A-1, read 15 August 2026).
Five questions that follow from it
- Is the appraisal independent, and who signs it?
- Will the report still be inside 12 months when we grant?
- What happens after a material event?
- Who talks to the auditor?
- Can we see a sample report before we buy?
The one thing that does not matter
The fee. Nothing in section 409A or its regulations turns on what you paid. A current, complete, properly performed appraisal at $990 is worth more than a stale one at $10,000. The reason to spend more is complexity: multiple preferred classes, SAFEs and convertibles, secondary transactions, tender offers, or an approaching liquidity event, all of which move the work from a template to an allocation problem. Several providers here say exactly that about their own pricing: Eton states it prices on cap table complexity and turnaround only, and Eqvista states its stage-based tiers may vary with revenue, stakeholder count and capital structure.
If you are doing it yourself
There is a third safe harbor route for illiquid stock of a start-up corporation: a valuation made reasonably and in good faith, evidenced by a written report, but only where it is performed by someone the company reasonably determines is qualified, which the regulation describes as generally at least five years of relevant experience in business valuation or appraisal, financial accounting, investment banking, private equity, secured lending or comparable experience. It does not apply if a change in control is reasonably anticipated within 90 days or a public offering within 180 days. Most companies find that the qualified-person test is the reason they hire someone.
This is general information about a US federal tax rule, not tax or legal advice, and it does not address state law. Talk to your counsel and your accountant before relying on any of it.